Shiny movies with pretty people: Thor
May. 3rd, 2011 04:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was somewhat dragged to see Thor, because my mother of all people decided she wants something pretty and brainless.
Not brainless, as it turned out (Kenneth Brannagh directing, J.Michael Straczynski with a writing credit, team from Terminator:Sarah Connor Chronicles - I should have guessed), but so. Immensely. Pretty.
Honestly, I could screencap any moment of the Asgard scenes and hang it on my wall. Classic pulp SF art, all soaring spires and gold and crystal, with angles and costumes to match. These are my childhood fairytales, and oh, they made them sing.
And really, nothing ruins it. I adore and root for Loki, of course, who is smart and tragic and engaging (and avoids chewing through scenery, unlike everyone else in Asgard and Jotunheim). There's not a single weak person in the cast, from Anthony Hopkins on down. For female characters, we get four strong major ones (a full third of MCs, impressive for a Hollywood movie) and the Bechdel test is passed with an impressive amount of technobabble. Good music. Very decent writing for a comic book movie, you can really tell which Shakespearean undertones they aimed for (and managed to hit). Chris Hemsworth in tight and/or missing shirts is the cherry on the cake.
I can get behind this kind of summer movie :) Pirates next, Captain America and X-Men First Class - anything else interesting coming out?
(Also, for a 3D movie this didn't give me a headache at all. I think the amount of CGI helps.)
Not brainless, as it turned out (Kenneth Brannagh directing, J.Michael Straczynski with a writing credit, team from Terminator:Sarah Connor Chronicles - I should have guessed), but so. Immensely. Pretty.
Honestly, I could screencap any moment of the Asgard scenes and hang it on my wall. Classic pulp SF art, all soaring spires and gold and crystal, with angles and costumes to match. These are my childhood fairytales, and oh, they made them sing.
And really, nothing ruins it. I adore and root for Loki, of course, who is smart and tragic and engaging (and avoids chewing through scenery, unlike everyone else in Asgard and Jotunheim). There's not a single weak person in the cast, from Anthony Hopkins on down. For female characters, we get four strong major ones (a full third of MCs, impressive for a Hollywood movie) and the Bechdel test is passed with an impressive amount of technobabble. Good music. Very decent writing for a comic book movie, you can really tell which Shakespearean undertones they aimed for (and managed to hit). Chris Hemsworth in tight and/or missing shirts is the cherry on the cake.
I can get behind this kind of summer movie :) Pirates next, Captain America and X-Men First Class - anything else interesting coming out?
(Also, for a 3D movie this didn't give me a headache at all. I think the amount of CGI helps.)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 02:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 03:46 pm (UTC)And note: Thor's proof of newly gained maturity and insight isn't winning a duel or fighting better, it's being able to consider the civilians first, evacuating them, letting other people who at that point are more qualified do the fighting, and then, when it becomes clear the destructive villain is only destroying because of him, sacrificing himself without a fuss. I approve of this in an action hero.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 04:08 pm (UTC)Mind you, he's matched in Thor being mostly mature, rather than the "aren't I cool??" antihero Stark, or somewhat hyperactive and moodswingy Spiderman. And I really liked the way the girls were handled - Sif being the more-or-less leader of the Warrior Three, Frigga laying into the Frost Giants with his sword, and the Jane-Darcy mentor-mentee relationship. I think I can stand behind this take on superhero movies. Here's hoping X-men:First Class is of the same class!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 04:57 pm (UTC)Isn't the last Harry Potter movie due out this summer?
B is a big Green Lantern fan, so he plans to see that.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 05:03 pm (UTC)And of course, forgot Potter! I'll have to hunt down a subtitled showing again - for some reason it gets classed as a kids-movie-only here and dubbed.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 05:15 pm (UTC)It was absolutely amusing, yes.
XWA
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 05:41 pm (UTC)The superhero movie is an easy cocktail to mismanage, so I'm happy this time they did it right :)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 07:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 07:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 07:53 pm (UTC)Also, were there any particularly scary or unsettling parts or images in the film? I ask because one of my friends who would go with me has mental health issues and so she can get quite easily unsettled by visual images. I don't want for her to come and find that it starts upsetting her (general violence is normally okay though, unless it's overly graphic or gory).
As an end note, I'd like to note that my film rental place began their review of Thor with "Stop! Hammer time!" which I thought was a moment of genius. XD
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 08:01 pm (UTC)One trigger could be medical settings. Thor lands on Earth (in the first scene ;)) and doesn't take well to a hospital, so he's subdued with tranquilisers and later tied to a bed. All done without graphicness, but I see where it could make a person with mental issues shiver - maybe alert her to it and assure her that he escapes shortly?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 08:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 08:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 08:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-03 11:09 pm (UTC)(Did you see the post credits bit?)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:02 am (UTC)And alas, they kicked us out before post-credits. I know what's there, but I haven't found youtube footage yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:05 am (UTC)Aw man! Well let's just say the postbcredits bit made me squee because it sets up Loki for The Avengers (Hiddleston's casting in that already confirmed anyway).
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:49 am (UTC)http://www.chud.com/50856/thor-press-conference-part-1-the-cast/
http://www.chud.com/50884/thor-press-conference-part-2-the-filmmakers/
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 01:42 am (UTC):D
(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 02:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 05:23 pm (UTC)Other stuff to look out for besides what you mentioned - and I swear I'm not mentioning these for the eyecandy alone, though there are some fine specimens present in each:
* Priest (vampire flick starring Paul Bettany) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0822847/
* Conan the Barbarian (mmmm,
Ronon DexKhar DrogoJason Momoa ♥) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0816462/* Coriolanus (given teh cast, this could be either good or bad) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1372686/
* Immortals (here there be Henry Cavill) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1253864/
* (yet another remake of) The Three Musketeers (starring Orlando Bloom in
bloomersfunny pants) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1509767/(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-04 06:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-06 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-06 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-05-16 05:42 pm (UTC)