Glamour photos of celebrities - before and after Photoshop
Mouse over the images and see how bellies and buttocks were tucked in, skins smoothed, arms narrowed, cellulite erased. And those are the beauty queens. Erases all complexes with a touch of the retouch brush.
(Gacked from pl.rec.uroda.)
Mouse over the images and see how bellies and buttocks were tucked in, skins smoothed, arms narrowed, cellulite erased. And those are the beauty queens. Erases all complexes with a touch of the retouch brush.
(Gacked from pl.rec.uroda.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 07:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 09:32 pm (UTC)On a more positive note, these pictures have reminded me that everyone's skin does weird things when they do weird twisty poses. When I was a teenager, I thought I was a freak because I was the only one who seemed to have that...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 09:55 pm (UTC)On a more positive note, these pictures have reminded me that everyone's skin does weird things when they do weird twisty poses.
If only more people remembered that, we might be spared the sight of too many women in too-tight clothing that resembles a pond with an octopus somewhere down making waves, every time they move ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 08:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 08:27 am (UTC)I just think of the times I've heard guys (and girls) describe an average-weight woman as "OMG so fat", because they're comparing her to all those false photoshopped images ~_~ Or they think "she should look like Celebrity A", and they don't even know what Celebrity A's body looks like because they've never seen a real photo of her. And I think that's very much a Polish thing... there's lots and lots more skeleton-thin Polish girls than there are in Italy, and in Ireland there were none, period.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 08:29 am (UTC)She said something like: "They'll fix the picture. They'd fix the picture even if I was at my pre-pregnancy weight. No one looks the way models do in magazines in real life."
It's too bad more people don't realize this.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 11:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 11:18 am (UTC)And the one where they tilted the foreground picture - would've been better if they'd noticed the mirror behind and photoshopped it to match *LOL* - talk about inattentive!
How are we supposed to try and measure up, though, if it's all make believe anyway - there are young girls out there seriously ill due to trying to look like this sort of unrealistic image :-/
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 11:43 am (UTC)No, I thought that too. The ones of Halle Berry where she actually had *gasp* one or two lines on her face in the non-airbrushed versions? She looked better there, IMO. In the retouched ones she looks like a waxwork. Some of them were totally over-done, no one's skin is THAT smooth and shiny.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 11:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 02:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 11:59 am (UTC)Especially when they soften the ribs and collarbones of models who are so underweight -- that's just going to make normal women looking at those people mad, thinking THAT is what they are supposed to look like.
They're not doing the same thing to the men, except for eliminating skin folds from weird poses. The only man who was a focus of picture just had the lighting changed for him. He wasn't enhanced in any way that I could really notice.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 12:20 pm (UTC)