The only reason they did the revision was because of the uproar the community raised, and the way people pointed out that content of a journal or community can still be currently valued even if the journal or community itself is dead. I don't think they realized that people do go back and read old journals for fun. They just figured the old stuff wouldn't be missed, and it was worth deleting it to free up a ton of usernames.

But at least they're capable of learning! That right there puts them miles ahead of 6A.